solitude and community

Continuing with Life Together by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, we get to this on page 77 and 78:

Let him who cannot be alone beware of community. He will only do harm to himself and the community.  Alone you stood before God when he called you; alone you had to answer that call; alone you had to struggle and pray; and alone you will die and give an account to God.  You cannot escape from yourself; for God has singled you out.

……

But the reverse is also true:  Let him who is not in community beware of being alone. Into the community you were called, and the call was not meant for you alone; in the community of the called you bear the cross, you struggle, you pray.  You are not alone, even in death, and on the Last Day you will be only one member of the great congregation of Jesus Christ.  If you scorn the fellowship of the brethren, you reject the call of Christ and thus your solitude can only be hurtful to you.

We recognize, then, that only as we are within the fellowship can we be alone, and only he that is alone can live in the fellowship…..

…….

Let him who cannot be alone beware of community.  Let him who is not in community beware of being alone.

In thinking about this, compare Romans 14:12

“So then each of us will give an account of himself to God”

with

Hebrews 3:13

“But exhort one another every day, as long as it is called “today,” that none of you may be hardened by(B) the deceitfulness of sin”

and Hebrews 10:24-25

“24 And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, 25 not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.”

Posted in church, teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hour of Power

you have got to check out Mark Driscoll wearing a tie and preaching the Gospel to the crowd in the Crystal Cathedral on the Hour of Power.

Resurgence blog post about it here.

Direct link to video here.

transcript here.

Think about the message that Mark is bringing in the forum managed by Dr. Robert Schuller. Maybe spend some time with Michael Horton’s 1992 interview with Dr. Schuller here or here to get a feel for how amazing it is that Mark Driscoll got the chance to bring this message in this forum.

small sample of the interview but please go read the whole thing. (MH=Michael Horton, RS=Robert Schuller)

MH: But isn’t it because faith is the instrument through which we’re justified before a God who otherwise would take account of us for our sins, not just our “not trusting…”

RS: We are not justified by faith.
MH: No, it is by grace through faith.

RS: By grace through faith, that’s right.
MH: But what I’m asking is this. Justified from what? The wrath of God?

RS: Oh! I’ll never use that language
MH: But the Bible does.

RS: Yes, the Bible does, but the Bible is God’s book to believers primarily. Listen, and then call me a heretic if you want to, but I’m interested in attracting people, and not driving them farther away. There is language I can and will use and there are times, if we are wise, there is language we will not use….If God is a God of love, how do we handle this concept of wrath? At the outset, on the surface, it appears to be a contradiction; maybe it is. I tell you this, I have come to the conclusion that I haven’t stepped into the center of truth until I’ve dared to step into contradiction. The Bible is a contradiction: Old Testament–Law, New Testament–Grace. Jesus is a contradiction; totally human and totally God.

MH: Of course we would say that that the dual nature of Christ is a mystery but not a contradiction.
RS: It is a contradiction, but you know what? Contradictions are ultimate points of creativity…

Posted in church | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What she said

I agree with what Jennifer Rubin says here. there are market based sensible approaches that can be taken to reform our health insurance/health care system in this country, but the left wingers in charge aren’t interested in any such thing.

So why doesn’t the Obama team or their allies look to some alternative ideas, including interstate competition and tax credits, to spur individual purchase of insurance? (We won’t even ask about tort reform, which is an anathema to Democrats dependent on the largess of trial lawyers.) Well certainly, Obama and liberal lawmakers are having a tough time giving up the idea of universal coverage provided by the government. If they can’t get nationalized medicine now they may never succeed. So until the last Blue Dog’s arm has been twisted they won’t throw in the towel quite yet.

But in some sense, it would not be attractive for Obama and his liberal cohorts to open up insurance competition, even if it would almost certainly gain a large bipartisan majority in Congress and succeed in increasing availability and lowering costs. Really, from their perspective, the whole point is for government to be giving out health care. There is no glory in allowing the free market to deliver health care. Politicians aren’t going to get much credit for that. And for those incumbents enjoying the flood of lobbyists and constituents who would be all seeking to tweak a government-run system one way or another—and pony up commensurate political contributions—there is little to be gained by simply pointing voters to the internet for an expanded list of insurers.

UPDATE:

funny video link courtesy of Jonah Goldberg over at the Corner

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ_tAe87ELo&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

a wife's submission

here is the personal story of a former feminist atheist who eventually converted to catholicism learning to embrace the leadership of her husband in the home.


There has also been a part of my conversion on this issue that cannot be explained in terms of logic and reason. It’s nothing I could prove to a skeptic, but I have seen God work in my life in a big way on the occasions when I’ve sacrifice my own preferences in order to let my husband have the tiebreaking vote. Even when I am just sure that I am right, when I am positive that the fabric of the universe will tear apart if things don’t go my way, when I step aside and turn the decision over to my husband, things have this uncanny way of working out for the best.
….

I’ve found that submitting to my husband’s authority is not about power and control, but about freeing up everyone’s mental energy to live and love and focus on what really matters. As with so many other things, these ideas about household structure that I once saw as oppressive and cold rules I now see as just part of a prescription for living a life of love.

the whole thing is very interesting and worth a thorough read.

hat tip to @kathrynlopez on twitter.

Posted in family | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

God Provides

Continuing with Life Together by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, we get to this on page 72:

God must feed us. We cannot and dare not demand this food as our right, for we, poor sinners, have not merited it. Thus the sustenance that God provides becomes a consolation of the afflicted; for it is the token of the grace and faithfulness with which God supports and guides His children. True, the Scriptures say, “If any will not work, neither let him eat” (II Thess. 3:10, A.R.V.) and thus make the receiving of bread strictly dependent upon working for it. But the Scriptures do not say anything about any claim that the working person has upon God for his bread. The work is commanded, indeed, but the bread is God’s free and gracious gift. We cannot simply take it for granted that our work provides us with bread; this is rather God’s order of grace.

we would do well to remember the admonitions that Moses gave the children of Israel in the book of Deuteronomy and especially chapter 8.

11“Take care lest you forget the LORD your God by not keeping his commandments and his rules and his statutes, which I command you today, 12(M) lest, when you have eaten and are full and have built good houses and live in them, 13and when your herds and flocks multiply and your silver and gold is multiplied and all that you have is multiplied, 14(N) then your heart be lifted up, and you(O) forget the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery, 15who(P) led you through the great and terrifying wilderness,(Q) with its fiery serpents and scorpions(R)and thirsty ground where there was no water,(S) who brought you water out of the flinty rock, 16who fed you in the wilderness with(T) manna that your fathers did not know, that he might humble you and test you,(U) to do you good in the end. 17Beware(V) lest you say in your heart, ‘My power and the might of my hand have gotten me this wealth.’ 18You shall remember the LORD your God, for(W) it is he who gives you power to get wealth,(X) that he may confirm his covenant that he swore to your fathers, as it is this day19And if you forget the LORD your God and go after other gods and serve them and worship them,(Y) I solemnly warn you today that you shall surely perish. 20Like the nations that the LORD makes to perish before you,(Z) so shall you perish, because you would not obey the voice of the LORD your God.

emphasis added

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

tornados and Lutherans

I am sure everybody has seen John Piper’s post about Providence, Tornados, Lutherans and Homosexuality. If not, hie thee hence and get after it.

6. Conclusion: The tornado in Minneapolis was a gentle but firm warning to the ELCA and all of us: Turn from the approval of sin. Turn from the promotion of behaviors that lead to destruction. Reaffirm the great Lutheran heritage of allegiance to the truth and authority of Scripture. Turn back from distorting the grace of God into sensuality. Rejoice in the pardon of the cross of Christ and its power to transform left and right wing sinners.

There is a disturbing distortion that is disturbingly common among people who claim to be Christ followers. it is the confusion of the unconditional love with which God loves us and the license that comes from thinking of God’s grace as a cheap get out of hell free card and nothing more.

here is how David Powlison put it.

There is something wrong with you! From God’s point of view, you not only need someone else to be killed in your place in order to be forgiven, you need to be transformed to be fit to live with. The word ‘unconditional’ may be an acceptable way to express God’s welcome, but it fails to communicate its purpose: a comprehensive and lifelong rehabilitation, learning ‘the holiness without which no one will see the Lord.’ Seeing with New Eyes. (pp.168-169)

and here is Todd Buru’s followup to the Powlison quote:

But even further than this, I think that by referring to God’s love as unconditional we have begun importing the cultural understanding of this concept into our Christian practice. We are tolerant of all sorts of devaint behavior and sin, especially our own, and so is “God”. We want to be able to pray a prayer and then go back to business as usual and so that’s what “God” commands. We have trouble speaking up about the Bible’s comments on gender roles and sexuality and so we find inventive ways to change “God’s” mind on them. From all of this we get things such as easy believism, free grace theology, and even Christian universalism, which in my mind is the next big conflict rising within the church.

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

phriday photos

just something about film that looks different.
peeking over

really hot out at Waterloo Park last weekend
trying to keep cool

almost 90
Birthday party

Posted in photography | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

reality of marriage

Challies put up an article on Monday just after his eleventh wedding anniversary that was a very real look at marriage through the device of wanting to give his younger newly married self some counseling.

the whole thing is good, but I thought this part was especially helpful because so many people have unrealistic ideas of the marriage relationship:

Prepare to Hurt and Be Hurt!. One of the greatest ironies and the greatest tragedies of marriage is that a husband and wife have more opportunities to sin against one another than against anyone else in all the world. Over the course of eleven years of marriage, I have hurt Aileen more than anyone else and have sinned against her more than I’ve sinned again anyone else. I suppose this means that marriage also offers unparalleled opportunities to extend forgiveness and to choose to overlook sin. While Aileen and I have had our share of struggles over the years, I truly believe that we carry no bitterness toward one another. Through God’s grace we have offered and received forgiveness time and time again. And through his grace we have overlooked many an offense. Yet there have been many occasions when we have hurt one another and when we have let this wounds fester for just a little too long.

If I could go back, I would prepare myself to be hurt and, even more, would seek to emphasize kindness and forbearance and grace so that I could hurt my wife far less often.

that is why I Peter 4:8 says “Above all, keep fervent in your love for one another, because love covers a multitude of sins.”

I can tell you after 20 years of married life that in a marriage there are many many sins that will need to be covered by fervent love. It is when you let your love grow cold that bitterness grows. Once bitterness takes hold of your heart, it is very difficult to uproot, so that love can flourish again.

The writer of Hebrews warned against ever letting the root of bitterness grow and prescribed the grace of God as the preventative. “See to it that no one fails to obtain the grace of God; that no “root of bitterness” springs up and causes trouble, and by it many become defiled.”

Posted in family | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

no direct fellowship?

going back to pages 35-36 of Life Together by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, he makes a curious argument. He says that Christians should not desire to be directly involved in the lives of other believers.

Check this out:

Because Christ stands between me and others, I dare not desire direct fellowship with them. As only Christ can speak to me in such a way that I may be saved, so others too, can be saved only by Christ himself. This means that I must release the other person from every attempt of mine to regulate, coerce, and dominate him with my love. The other person needs to retain his independence of me; to be loved for what he is, as one for whom Christ became man, died, and rose again, for whom Christ bought forgiveness of sins and eternal life. Because Christ has long since acted decisively for my brother, before I could begin to act, I must leave him his freedom to be Christ’s; I must meet him only as the person that he already is in Christ’s eyes.

….
[Spiritual love] will not seek to move others by all too personal, direct influence, by impure interference in the life of another...It will rather meet the other person with the clear Word of God and be ready to leave him alone with this Word for a long time, willing to release him again in order that Christ may deal with him.

emphasis added.

what do you think? How does this compare with Paul’s words in II Corinthians 5:

14 For Christ’s love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died. 15 And he died for all, that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised again.
16 So from now on we regard no one from a worldly point of view. Though we once regarded Christ in this way, we do so no longer. 17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!

emphasis added

Posted in books | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

the Death Penalty

Challies has reviewed The Death Penalty on Trial by Ron Gleason.

It sounds like a interesting and useful book for Christians who have trouble with the Death Penalty as a possible punishment by the State.

Go read the whole review and see what you think. I thought this part was a particularly interesting bit of perspective:

A theme that runs throughout the book is this: all murder is killing but not all killing is murder. Thus a person who murders another can be justly executed by the governing authorities without multiplying the evil. To kill a murderer is not to commit another murder. Rather, terrible though it is to have to take a life, it is an act of justice and a fitting penalty for one who would destroy a person made in God’s image.

Posted in books | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

It is not our heart that determines our course

continuing to read Life Together by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, you get to page 55.

this is some really great stuff on the importance of Biblical literacy:

How, for example, shall we ever attain certainty and confidence in our personal and church activity if we do not stand on solid Biblical ground? It is not our heart that determines our course, but God’s word. But who in this day has any proper understanding of the need for scriptural proof? How often we hear innumerable arguments “from life” and “from experience” put forward as the basis for most crucial decisions, but the argument of Scripture is missing. And this authority would perhaps point in exactly the opposite direction. It is not surprising, of course, that the person attempts to cast discredit upon their wisdom should be the one who himself does not seriously read, know, and study the Scriptures. But one who will not learn how to handle the Bible for himself is not an evangelical Christian.

…..he who can speak out of the abundance of God’s Word, the wealth of directions, admonitions, and consolations of the Scriptures, will be able through God’s Word to drive out demons and help his brother.

emphasis added.

Like I have said before and I will very likely continue to say many times in the future, what would it look like if Christians who profess to believe that the Bible is God’s inspired Word to us actually believed that II Timothy 3:16-17 means what it says and lived like it?

16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work.

Do we really believe this? Do we really believe that the Bible is useful and will lead to full competence and equipping? really? Do we act like it? If we were to act in accordance with this professed belief what would we do?

Posted in bible, teaching | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Prosperity Gospel is a false Gospel

after reading this from Dr. Mohler, I think that I am beginning to understand why John Piper hates the prosperity gospel so intensely.

The New York Times took note of the fact that the current recession and financial distress did not keep the crowd from attending the Southwest Believers’ Convention. The event is part of the ministry of Kenneth and Gloria Copeland, described by Laurie Goodstein as the “current patriarch and matriarch” of the prosperity gospel. The paper summarized their message as the promise that if an individual has sufficient faith in God and donates generously, God will reward that generosity by multiplying the offerings a hundredfold.

Those who might curtail their donations during the recession were warned of the spiritual consequences. “Fear it will make you stingy,” said Kenneth Copeland.
….
Prosperity theology is a False Gospel. Its message is unbiblical and its promises fail. God never assures his people of material abundance or physical health. Instead, Christians are promised the riches of Christ, the gift of eternal life, and the assurance of glory in the eternal presence of the living God.

maddening. taking money from people who don’t have it using a lie and a cheap substitute for the Gospel.

here is John Piper again in case you haven’t seen it.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTc_FoELt8s&hl=en&fs=1&]

Posted in church | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

anatomy of a carve out

check this out. which hospital is this?

“A hospital that was recognized as a comprehensive cancer center or clinical cancer research center by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health as of April 20, 1983, that is located in a State which, as of December 19, 1989, was not operating a demonstration project under section 1814(b), that applied and was denied, on or before December 31, 1990, for classification as a hospital involved extensively in treatment for or research on cancer under this clause (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this subclause), that as of the date of the enactment of this subclause, is licensed for less than 50 acute care beds, and that demonstrates for the 4-year period ending on December 31, 1996, that at least 50 percent of its total discharges have a principal finding of neoplastic disease, as defined in subparagraph (E).”

from Greg Scandlan who notes that the only people who know which hospital this is are the Congressman who inserted this into the bill and the person(s) who bribed him to do it.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Carville can't count

I don’t know because I don’t watch the show, but did anyone at CNN question Carville’s crazy cajun calumny?

Here’s Carville on CNN’s State of the Union today:

Put a bill out there, make them filibuster it. Make them be what they are — the party of no. Look, we spend — the truth of the matter is, we spend about $8,000 per person in the United States on health care. The second — the country that seconds the second most is Switzerland, they spend $4,000. That means you have got $4,000 per person more that we spend on health care, that is $1.2 trillion, 4,000 times 300 million. And you know what? Run on it. A lot of people — and we’re not producing any kind of results that double that money provides. Let them kill it. Let them kill it with the interest group money, then run against them. That’s what we ought to do.

Let’s just suppose for a brief moment that every Republican representative in the House and Senate holds their courage and votes against whatever monstrosity of a bill gets put forth as “health care reform.” Let’s just suppose that all 40 Republican Senators hold together on the cloture vote. Admittedly, both of these things are highly unlikely, but just suppose it with me for a moment.

Even if they did so, Republicans can’t stop it. They can’t even slow it down. Not even a little bit. They can’t amend it or impede it.

In order for this monstrosity to be stopped, or impeded or amended or otherwise messed with in any form or fashion Democrats have to do it.

it is simple math. Democrats have 256 out of 435 votes in the house (Carville, that is way more than the 50% needed to pass anything there). and with the addition of Senator Stuart Smalley from Minnesota, Democrats have a filibuster proof 60 out of a 100 votes in the Senate.

It is false, erroneous, misleading, crazy, insane, nuts, etc. for Carville to claim that Republicans have the ability to stop “Health Care Reform.” they can’t.

Either Carville can’t count or he is preemptively trying to cast blame in the Republican direction for what will be a a solely Democratic failure.

I think the blame shifting attempt is so transparent that it should backfire on him and his autocratic compadres.

But that would mean that the “journalists” at CNN would have to have the wherewithal to say some slightly modified version of: “uhhh, James. How is that possible? Shouldn’t you concentrate on holding your own party together and ramming through whatever you want? After all you guys have the votes to pass whatever liberal fantasy you can concoct, don’t you?”

Like another curmudgeon said in a movie I liked, “Go sell crazy somewhere else, we’re all stocked up here.”

Hat tip to Allahpundit

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

everday Gospel

via Ramblin’ Pastor Man, here is a short video with John Piper explaining that we need the Gospel every day.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwn2GLm5MsY&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

the hope

this is the hope we have because of the love of God.

1 John 3:1-3: “Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! Therefore the world does not know us, because it did not know Him. Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as He is pure.”

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Marriage

what is the point of marriage? If the only point of marriage is to be the highest expression of romantic love, then evangelical opposition to homosexual marriage is just mean. It would be mean to say to some people that their love is unworthy of expression in marriage while other people get the sanction of the state on their love for one another.

This is the argument that homosexual marriage activists make. Any caring person would certainly agree with that argument if the point of marriage is to express romantic love.

but that isn’t the primary point of marriage. and it never has been the primary point of marriage in any society in any time. as I pointed out a while back, a liberal democratic anthropologist made the secular case against homosexual marriage as well as anybody can. Marriage is for having and raising children.

However, once this principle is washed away, then there is no principled basis for denying marriage to anyone who wants to use it as the highest expression of their romantic love for another or others.

check out this article to see the next shoe to fall in the marriage wars.

As Newsweek magazine makes clear, some new flashpoints are getting restless.

Polyamory, reports Newsweek, is having a “coming-out-party.”  Polyamory is the current “term of art” applied to “families” or “clusters” comprised of multiple sexual partners. As Newsweek explains, this is not exactly polygamy, because marriage is not the issue. Advocates of polyamory argue that their lifestyle is not “open marriage.” Indeed, they define their movement in terms of the moral principle of “ethical nonmonogamy,” defined as “engaging in loving, intimate relationships with more than one person — based upon the knowledge and consent of everyone involved.”

in addition to polyamory/polygamy, if marriage is primarily only the highest expression of romantic love, then there is no principled barrier to a marriage between a parent and a grown child. There is no principled barrier to the marriage of grown siblings. and so on.

once anything goes, then anything will go.

You can say that this is just a slippery slope argument and you would be correct. On the other hand, this slope is slippery and there are no visible ledges or moguls where things might get hung up and/or slowed down.

do any of you see any?

Posted in culture | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

community as a gift of God's grace

A friend of mine gave me Life Together by Dietrich Bonhoeffer for my birthday and I am reading it. Oh wow is this some good, densely packed material!.

here is an example from page 18 in the opening chapter:

So between the death of Christ and the Last Day it is only by a gracious anticipation of the last things that Christians are privileged to live in visible fellowship with other Christians. It is by the grace of God that a congregation is permitted to gather visibly in this world to share God’s Word and sacrament. Not all Christians receive this blessing. The imprisoned, the sick, the scattered lonely, the proclaimers of the Gospel in heathen lands stand alone. They know that visible fellowship is a blessing.

Posted in church | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

foto friday

squirrel fight
shall we dance?

aggie bench bokeh
Aggie Bench and Tree Bokeh

golden light on the North side of the Capitol
sunset

Posted in photography | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

gospel centered

helpful reminder from Joe Thorn about the gospel and what it means to be gospel centered as a person and as a church.

The Gospel

Before we jump into gospel-centeredness we need to be clear about the gospel itself. In the simplest of terms the gospel is the life, death and resurrection of Jesus that accomplishes redemption and restoration for all who believe and all of creation. In his life Jesus fulfilled the law and accomplished all righteousness on behalf of sinners who have broken God’s law at every point. In his death Jesus atones for our sins, satisfying the wrath of God and obtaining forgiveness for all who believe. In his resurrection Jesus’ victory over sin and death is the guarantee of our victory over the same in and through him. Jesus’ saving work not only redeems sinners, uniting them to God, but also assures the future restoration of all creation. This is the gospel, the “good news,” that God redeems a fallen world by his grace.

…..

The Gospel-Centered Church

A gospel-centered church is a church that is about Jesus above everything else. That sounds a little obvious, but when we talk about striving to be and maintain gospel-centrality as a church we are recognizing our tendency to focus on many other things (often good and important things) instead of Jesus. There are really only two options for local churches; they will be gospel-centered, or issue driven.

Go check out the rest of his excellent post on the difference between the two kinds of churches.

Posted in church | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

I Peter 1:1-13

I have been spending a little time in I Peter again this week. I just love that letter and the more I study it the more that I see everything important is there.

Yesterday in Bible study we looked at the first 13 verses of the book.

Peter is writing to the elect exiles of the dispersion scattered in Asia Minor. These folks were uprooted from their homes in and around Jerusalem and forced to run for their lives around the time Stephen was stoned. see Acts 7-11.

The key bits are here in verses 3-9:

3(G) Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ!(H) According to his great mercy,(I) he has caused us to be born again to a living hope(J) through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, 4to(K) an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and(L)unfading,(M) kept in heaven for you, 5who by God’s power are being guarded(N) through faith for a salvation(O) ready to be revealed in the last time. 6In this you rejoice, though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been grieved by(P) various trials, 7so that(Q) the tested genuineness of your faith—more precious than gold that perishes(R) though it is tested by(S) fire—may be found to result in(T) praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ. 8(U)Though you have not seen him, you love him.(V) Though you do not now see him, you believe in him and rejoice with joy that is inexpressible and filled with glory, 9obtaining(W) the outcome of your faith, the salvation of your souls.

he reminds them of the work God did in saving them and the thing for which they have been and are being saved.  A living hope, to an inheritance of epic proportions.  Then he references the terrible things that have happened to them and will continue to happen to them (see chapter 4) because of their following Christ.  (as an aside, isn’t it interesting that he mentions that we are guarded by God’s power through faith for salvation.  Thank God and His mercy and grace that we had the faith to believe in Him when we woke up this morning.  what a wonderful blessed relief that my faith doesn’t depend on my power.)

then he gets to verse 13 which is one of my favorites.

13Therefore, girding up the loins of your mind, and being sober-minded, set your hope fully on the grace that will be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ.

the italicized portion is the word picture Peter used to mean gathering up the loose ends and tucking them in your belt so that you are ready for action. Can’t be tripping over the dress tail of our mind as we engage in setting our “hope fully on the grace” that will be brought to us when Jesus Christ is revealed.

So here are my questions for the guys yesterday and for all of us today:

Is it even possible for us christians who make up the modern evangelical church in America to “set our hope fully on the grace to be revealed at the revelation of Jesus Christ”?

Can we do it if our faith hasn’t been tested in fire and found to be genuine?

Can we do it if we continue to be torn between our stuff here and our own vision of the way the world ought to be for us here and the imperishable undefiled unfading inheritance that is yet to come?

If so, how?

If not, what does that mean needs to happen to us?

Posted in teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

new pages over to the left

a little page publishing and shifting around this morning.

I put the three parts to “Who do You Trust?” into one new page under “The Lie” since that is where it seemed to fit.

I also put both parts to “a Conception of Self” into one page under “the Lie” as well.

finally, I moved “Marriage and Happiness” to under the Lie so that all of the stuff on the same theme would be together.

Posted in writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

general principles

Kevin DeYoung gleans some general principles from Risking the Truth: Handling Error in the Church, the collection of interviews by Martin Downes.

You won’t agree with every line, just like those being interviewed don’t always agree with each other, but there is a remarkable similarity in the general approach to truth and error given by these men: preach the Bible, don’t neglect your own heart, don’t spend all your time on controversy, test your theology against historic creeds and confessions, beware of pride.

emphasis added.

go to Kevin’s place for some quotes from the interviews. Looks like an interesting book.

Posted in books | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

distraction from the Gospel

our enemy’s favorite play is the misdirection play. He doesn’t mind if a bunch of Christ followers get together to do “christian” things. He prefers that we stay huddled together in committees working out the details of the next building project or program designed to make ourselves more comfortable. he must especially like it when we expend great energy and fritter away the integrity and legitimacy of our message by getting involved in hand to hand combat in secular political society trying to recapture some mythical “christian” past as a “christian” nation.

whatever we do, if we aren’t loving our God with all of our heart soul mind and strength and our neighbors as ourselves in order to demonstrate the selfless love with which we have been loved, then our enemy is pleased.

I haven’t said anything about the American Patriots Bible because I didn’t have anything nice to say.

So I will simply link to Richard Gamble’s review and show this excerpt:

Publication of The American Patriot’s Bible ought to provoke a much needed debate in the United States about the church’s right relationship to civil society. This Bible may become a landmark in that debate, clarifying the issues as never before, forcing people to recognize the degree to which Americanism has penetrated Christianity. An Augustinian perspective may help frame that conversation. In Book XIX of The City of God, the Bishop of Hippo explained in which areas there can be peace and in which there must be conflict between the earthly and the heavenly cities. Christian and non-Christian have a common interest in earthly peace, good order, and the “necessaries of life.” But in matters of worship, Augustine wrote, the Christian was forced to “dissent” from the earthly city. The limits of the common life had been reached. The Christian was forced “to become obnoxious to those who think differently, and to stand the brunt of their anger and hatred and persecutions…” Praising piety and faith in general alongside remnants of the historic Christian faith, The American Patriot’s Bible combines the things of God and the things of Caesar at the very point where they most vigilantly need to be kept apart. When the City of Man sets up Americanism as its faith, the Christian is forced to dissent.

There is another problem here. Why nationalize the Bible? A nationalized Bible would seem in effect to reverse the story of redemption. At the core of Christianity is a message that the gospel of salvation is flung wide open to all peoples regardless of nationality, race, or language. The day of Pentacost made that truth clear. While Christianity has inevitably taken on national accents as it has encountered culture after culture over the past 2,000 years, it is a universal faith. Why, then, take that transnational faith and fuse it with an earthly Caesar and empire by setting it side by side in pages of Holy Writ with a particular nation’s history and identity, as if Christianity belonged to Americans in a special and intimate way not true of other people? This Bible by its very existence distorts the gospel. As Augustine says in The City of God, the “heavenly city, while it sojourns on earth, calls citizens out of all nations, and gathers together a society of pilgrims of all languages…”

Go read the rest. It is delicious.

Hat tip to Nathan Finn, who adds:

For what it’s worth, the wife of a good friend of mine was horrified to receive a free copy of this book at an event during the SBC Annual Meeting in Louisville. She saw it as a key commentary on why Southern Baptists need a Great Commission Resurgence–because too many of us have become distracted by a desire to return America to her “Christian roots” (among other distractions) rather than laboring for the sake of the gospel so that more Americans (and people from every tribe, tongue, and nation) will become Christians. I agree 100%.

Posted in church, culture | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

a study in contrasts

this is interesting. our president wants to unite us all under a pragmatic banner listening to all points of view, except that he wants some people to quit talking and get out of the way.

all in the same speech. how long will it take before the bloom is completely off of this rose?

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dyY3Y9vxR0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

from Hot Air where Allahpundit notes:

This clip really is exactly as advertised, showcasing both the myth of Obama that the media’s happily carried forth and the reality of what kind of politician he is when his agenda’s threatened. Amazing that with his approval rating slipping and anger getting hotter every day, he’d still feel confident enough to contradict himself this blatantly in the same speech. It’s practically a taunt.

Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment